I am a Yankee-- more specifically I am a
Yankee from the Great State of Ohio. I have lived most of my life in Ohio,
though I spent two years in North Carolina attending graduate school.
Growing up a Yankee I learned about the
Civil War from a white northern perspective. We must always remember that when
it comes to reading history, perspective is everything. I am thankful that my
parents instilled in me a real vision of all persons created as equal in the
image of God regardless of their skin color. I am thankful I did not grow up in
a racist home. It was from that perspective that I understood the terrible and
evil atrocity of slavery in America.
But my upbringing did not instill in me the
knowledge of the subtleties of racism. I don't blame my parents for that. We
lived in a white world, for the most part, and we were shielded from those
subtle forms of racism that African Americans experienced regularly.
But as I got older and my world became
larger, I began to realize that racism and racial discrimination were
intrinsically embedded in American society in ways I had never realized. One
aspect of that embedded racism was the symbolism displayed by society. There
are more than a few of those symbols, but the one I speak of in this post is
the Confederate battle flag.
As a young man, I began to hear the calls
rising from some quarters demanding removal of that flag from government
property because of its racist overtones. I confess at the time that I did not
understand that perspective. Sure, I understood the connection between the battle
flag and the Civil War and the South, but I reasoned to myself that it was
silly to get worked up over a symbol and not everyone, I thought, who has a
Confederate battle flag or the flag of the Confederacy (the Stars and Bars) on
their bumper surely is a racist. I bought into the line from those who said
that the Confederate flag was not a symbol of racism, but a display of southern
heritage and pride, much like my fellow Buckeyes who fly the state flag of
Ohio. That was my perspective until one day that I will never forget.
When our children were young (they are now
grown and gone), we would vacation in the south--Virginia, North and South
Carolina-- and we regularly visited historical sites. On one particular
occasion we were in Charlottesville, Virginia visiting Thomas Jefferson's home,
Monticello. We had given our children money for vacation to spend on whatever
they wanted-- souvenirs, et al. At the time our son, Joshua was really into
flags and had something of a collection. When we were in the gift shop after
our visit to Jefferson's house, he naturally gravitated toward the display of
various small flags. He pulled a Confederate battle flag from the kiosk and
brought it to me for purchase. At that moment, I had an epiphany. As I looked
at that miniature Stars and Bars, I was not sure I wanted him to have it... and
as I stood there, I was not quite sure why. I hesitated for a moment and then
told my son that he could not buy that flag. He would have to choose another.
I spent the rest of the day thinking about
that moment attempting to make sense of my dis-ease. As I put words to my
concerns, it was clear to me. I did not want my son owning a symbol that could
not be divorced from the belief that certain people could be property. I could
not let him display something that in its original context promoted legalized
slavery to the extent that some people were willing to kill and be killed for
its preservation. And I had to explain to him why I would not let him buy it.
Today, Joshua is twenty-five, but he remembers that incident and is grateful
for the lesson he learned.
Because of history, certain symbols get so
wedded to ideas and movements that it becomes impossible to see the symbol and
not think of those ideas and those events that made them prominent; and no
amount of denial can change that. During the reign of the Roman empire
countless individuals were crucified, but because of Christianity when someone sees
a cross today, only one particular crucified individual is remembered. The
swastika originally was a symbol of good fortune. It also was used in early
Christian and Byzantine art-- a gammadion cross-- a symbol of the death of
Jesus. But because of the Nazis employment of that symbol, it is not possible
to see a swastika today without recalling to mind the evil of the Nazis. The
swastika is forever embedded with that evil. Would anyone today seriously
suggest trying to employ the swastika once again in our church sanctuaries as a
symbol for Jesus' death?
After my new found epiphany, I began to do
some research on the Confederate battle flag, and Confederate symbols and
monuments. It reinforced to me even more that it was impossible to separate
America's history of slavery from the symbols and statues of the Confederacy.
History has a way of dispelling our cover stories, and to say that the
Confederate flag is only a symbol of Southern heritage is a cover story that
can only be believed when one is in a state of denial. The attempt to divorce
our symbols from the context that gives them meaning is to commit willful
amnesia as to who we were as a people so that we can deny what we have
inherited and must still confront today. To quote Civil War historian, William
C. Davis, "Symbols matter. They say at a glimpse what words cannot,
encapsulating beliefs and aspirations, prejudices and fears. Having no
intrinsic value, they take meaning from the way we use them, changing over time
along with our actions."
When we remove the symbols of our racist
history from monumental status to the displays of museums, we are not denying
our history, but putting them in their proper context. Indeed, the Confederate
monuments themselves, erected in the twentieth century during Jim Crow, were
themselves an attempt to erase the sordid history of slavery and replace it
with the fictitious notion of the Lost Cause. As displays, they tell the story
of who we were; as monuments they proclaim who we still want to be. As displays
they remind us of the values that our ancestors embraced; as monuments they
continue to proclaim those values as somehow still important. When a community
places a monument in public, it is a declaration of what the people who put it
there value. No one should be duped into believing that a monument in public
makes no moral claims. When communities continue to embrace those monuments,
they are affirming the values of those who put them there in the first place.
We must remember the worst of our history.
That does not mean we have to idolize it in the town square or on government
property.
Symbols matter.
___
Allan R. Bevere is the pastor of Ashland First United Methodist Church (Ohio) and a Professional Fellow in Theology at Ashland Theological Seminary in Ashland, Ohio. He serves on the ACN Steering Committee. He blogs at allanbevere.com.
2 comments:
Excellent reflection! Monuments ARE Moral Statements. But because we have forgotten our own story as a nation, because we do not tell our children the story from the point of view of those who were being oppressed from the beginning, the foundation of our nation, until the present time, we do no know how to tell stories critically and prophetically as they are meant to be, as part of our heritage that continues to form the conscience of the nation. This is a family responsibility, part of our home life that has been so serious neglected. Parents are the primary educators of families and this reflection shows a father awakening to his responsibilities. Well done!
Well stated. In N.C. where I have lived for 4-plus decades, I have been told firmly about the Confederate flag and Southern pride and heritage .... Yet I remember a young white young man wearing a confederate flag ballcap -- around the time the movie, X, about Malcolm X came out. A line on his cap stated: "You wear your X and I'll wear mine." Patrick O'Neill
Post a Comment