"What does nonviolence
mean to you at a time like this?”
In a word: everything.
Nonviolence is the practical
representation of my love and respect for humanity given my deep concern with
current conditions.
I write a lot, in my efforts
to promote peace and justice I’ve written nearly 100 op-eds (syndicated by
PeaceVoice here)
since Donald Trump was elected. Thinking about peace, caring about peace, and
declaring fidelity to causes of justice are good, but nonviolence is the
strategic avenue for acting on these promises and upholding my values.
It is challenging and deeply
personal.
On May 30th, 2020 I
joined thousands of protesters at the “Free Stamp” (a sculpture, of a stamp,
emblazoned with the word “Free”) in downtown Cleveland. We were assembled to
express support for Black Lives and to join the chorus decrying the suffering
we experienced in witnessing the murder of George Floyd. We marched and
chanted.
On May 30th, I was
also attacked—by my own government—with chemical weapons. Without warning, or
an order to disperse, the Cleveland Police Department attacked civilians with
chemical munitions (including teargas). [In recent weeks I have issued my
complaint and provided evidence regarding this violation, I trust positive
changes will be made.]
On the drive home I felt
these tears inside me. I have taught nonviolence for over a decade; it was the
late 90s when I last threw a punch. I’m committed to nonviolence for personal,
practical, and spiritual reasons (as imperfect as I am) and I cannot recall a
time I felt stronger retributive and vengeful desires. By the time I arrived
home I had processed my feelings, the lingering chemical residue lingered in my
nostrils for another couple days…
I do not mean to be
gratuitous, but without training in nonviolence I know anger would get the best
of me. I would have responded to the escalatory violence of the militarized
police department in kind. I would degrade the messages for peace and justice
by becoming an example used to twist reality and justify the violence to begin
with. The psychological responses in fight, flight, and flee have required me
to work. Whatever toxic masculinity I unintentionally absorbed no longer causes
me to lash out, but it was dramatically present that day.
I have learned: whatever the
problem, violence is never the solution.
I worry.
Scholarship on peace and
conflict presents serious concerns for potential political violence with the
upcoming election, regardless of who wins. This trend precedes, but has been
exaggerated by, Trump’s presidency. The bipartisan Freedom House organization
now ranks the US 52nd in the world in “Global Freedom.” Our
democratic norms and practices have been eroded; contested results in our
upcoming election, use of the military to suppress protests and public
gatherings, executive orders and other abuses, and disrespect to the democratic
transfer of power, could result in civil war (already threatened) or other mass
violence.
History and expertise present
great need for a force more powerful,
like the nonviolence used to oust Slobodan Milosevic in his efforts to steal an
election. Given the threats already present all Americans should be prepared to
engage in mass nonviolent civil resistance, if necessary.
I absolutely hope that the
threats do not manifest. I hope that cool heads prevail and that current
indicators and threats are exaggerated representations of real, but inflated,
political divides. But it is good practice for everyone to be prepared;
nonviolence is the only tool that can defend the country and the vote should we
experience attacks against our democratic institutions or political violence
surface this fall.
Whether or not our country
ends up in need of saving, it is already in clear need of healing. Nonviolence
is the strategic mechanism for applying pressure to deliver positive change.
The largest and most persistent movements opposing police brutality are happening,
people are resisting oppression, and needed positive change is on the horizon.
This can only be achieved with a continued commitment to nonviolence.
When I love my neighbors and
take the time understand their concerns, I give us the chance to collaboratively
problem solve and build community. I respect their humanity, sometimes we will
disagree, but we all deserve our rights, safety, and security. Nonviolence is
the only protection of personhood, any other coercive or destructive force is
part of the problem, and currently it is all at stake.
Wim Laven, Ph.D, an instructor of peace studies, political science, and conflict resolution, does research on forgiveness and reconciliation. He serves on the executive boards of the International Peace Research Association and its North American affiliate the Peace and Justice Studies Association. He is also a member of the ACN Steering Committee. Wim is a writer with numerous pieces syndicated by Peace Voice and he also works on the editorial team for the Peace Chronicle magazine. His experiences in the field range from mediating disputes in small claims court to interventions during complex humanitarian disasters.
No comments:
Post a Comment